Over at Cato-Unbound you can see four perspectives on climate policy from Jim Manzi, Joe Romm, Indur Goklany, and Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus.

You’ll see that the four perspectives are not all mutually incompatible, and in fact, each person has something insightful to add to the discussion. I particularly like the Nordhaus/Shellenberger notion of “Disagreeing to Agree”. It is nice to see an exchange of views from diverse positions on the climate issue. Cato doesn’t appear to allow comments, but if readers would like to discuss the policy debate on this thread, I’d be happy to join in the discussion.